Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary Kate Murray's avatar

When I used to work for Michael Graves he was always asked what the difference was between designing for Alessi (expensive) and for Target (cheap) — he always said the design process was the same, the difference was the materials used in manufacturing the objects. I guess the quantifier for the expensive booze is time, is it not? This has certainly made me think.

Expand full comment
Stefany Elliott's avatar

Very well said, Robert (and Aaron and Tony and Robert). As the owner of a PR firm that has worked with spirit brands of all sizes (and budgets), we see a marked difference in the goals and expectations depending on our point of contact. When we are hired by the marketing team of a brand, our conversations are far more geared towards what will generate clicks, what sort of stunt will get press, how can we get people buzzing about us. When we are working directly with a brand founder, the focus is more on how we can tell stories to drive sales and growth.

At the end of the day, mentions in Forbes, Robb Report, Men's Journal and so many other outlets are worth far more than the $145,000 bottle price to many brands. The people reading that coverage likely have the bottle price or more in student debt and most definitely won't be tasting it anytime soon, but they're now learning about your brand, the category, and the industry. The next time they're ordering whiskey at a bar, they might just be a little more curious about how something is made or the aging process. They may simply just add it to their rolodex of things to bring up in an awkward silence on their next date.

From the PR side, I clearly have a lot of thoughts on the topic, but I'll save my ramblings (or I'll have to start my own substack!).

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts